Calculator
Tip: Dixon's Q test is intended for small samples (n = 3 to 30) and only one suspected outlier at a time.
Use this dixon q test calculator to evaluate whether the smallest or largest value in a small dataset is a potential outlier. Supports sample sizes from 3 to 30 with 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence levels.
Tip: Dixon's Q test is intended for small samples (n = 3 to 30) and only one suspected outlier at a time.
Enter data and click “Calculate Dixon Q” to see results.
The Dixon Q test is a classical statistical method for identifying a single potential outlier in a small dataset. It is widely used in laboratory work, analytical chemistry, quality control, and research settings where sample sizes are limited and one measurement appears suspiciously far from the others.
Unlike broad outlier methods designed for larger samples, the Dixon Q test is specifically built for small n. The central idea is simple: compare the gap between the suspected outlier and its nearest neighbor against the full data range. If that ratio is large enough, and it exceeds a critical value from a published table, the point may be rejected as an outlier at a chosen confidence level.
This dixon q test calculator automates that process. It sorts your values, computes both low-end and high-end Q statistics, selects the requested side, and compares the result to the matching critical value for your sample size and confidence level.
For a sorted dataset x₁ ≤ x₂ ≤ ... ≤ xₙ, the Dixon statistic is:
Decision rule: if Qcalc > Qcritical, the suspected value can be considered an outlier at the selected confidence level. If Qcalc ≤ Qcritical, there is not enough evidence to reject it.
The calculator uses standard critical values for 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence. Choose your confidence level based on how strict you want the outlier decision to be. Higher confidence levels require stronger evidence before rejecting a value.
| Sample Size (n) | Q Critical (90%) | Q Critical (95%) | Q Critical (99%) |
|---|
First, enter your measurements exactly as collected. You can separate values with commas, spaces, or new lines. Next, pick a confidence level and indicate whether the suspicious value is the lowest, highest, or use automatic mode to inspect both ends.
After calculation, review the full result panel. You will see the sorted data, sample size, range, Q values on both ends, selected Q statistic, critical value, and final decision. This makes the logic transparent and easy to audit in reports or lab notebooks.
Suppose your data are: 10.2, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 11.9. The highest value (11.9) appears suspicious. Sorted data are already in order, range is 11.9 − 10.2 = 1.7, and the high-end gap is 11.9 − 10.6 = 1.3. So Qhigh = 1.3 / 1.7 ≈ 0.765.
For n = 5 at 95% confidence, Q critical is 0.710. Because 0.765 is greater than 0.710, the highest value qualifies as a potential outlier under the Dixon criterion. In practice, this statistical result should be paired with process context, instrument checks, and sample handling notes before final exclusion.
The Dixon Q test is practical and fast, but it has boundaries. It is designed for small samples and a single extreme value. If you suspect multiple outliers or have a larger dataset, methods such as robust statistics, Grubbs’ test variants, or modern anomaly detection workflows may be more appropriate.
The test is commonly applied when measurements are roughly from a normal process and ordered extremes are the focus. It does not replace experimental judgment. A value can be statistically unusual yet scientifically valid, or statistically acceptable yet operationally implausible due to known procedural errors.
Using a dixon q test calculator responsibly means treating it as a decision support tool, not an automatic data deletion button. Transparent documentation improves reproducibility and trust in scientific or engineering conclusions.
Use sample sizes from 3 to 30. This calculator enforces that range because Dixon critical values are tabulated for small samples.
You can evaluate both ends, but formal rejection should be interpreted as testing one suspected outlier at a time. Automatic mode helps screening, then you should apply judgment.
It means the criterion is stricter. Q must be larger to reject a point as an outlier, reducing false positives but making rejection less frequent.
No. Both are outlier tests, but they use different statistics and assumptions. Dixon Q is especially popular for very small samples and endpoint suspects.